Dear Simon. It has been some time since I sent you a note but I thought that you might be interested in the current 'state of being' of Young Tiger. It is still sitting on a flatbed trailer on the farm in Maryland. John the last owner died recently so its part of his small estate that Sara is trying to clean up slowly. No work has been done on it as far as I know but I could be wrong.He promised to let me know more - if and when. Young Tiger was lent by my stepfather. I repaid him its cost, but could never have repaid the gift of letting me sail her where I wanted. In 1965 into '66 this had been the boat in which I'd sailed to America. the 2700 mile transatlantic bit, between the Canaries and Barbados, and on via the Bahamas to Miama with a Cambridge friend. See her sat half in the sea below a palm, Young Tiger sporting baggy wrinkle and a self-steering vane, and that so sensible gunter rig, that her designer found impossible to market to most weekend sailors fixed on the ubiquitous Bermudan.
|Young Tiger in Admiralty Bay, Bequia 1966|
|Young Tiger in the Bay of Biscay in summer ~ 1964|
|Denys (far right) on HMS Shikari in the Denmark Strait ~ 1943|
|Homework: declining μιλάω - to speak|
|Cllr Quinnen, Linda Baddeley and Mike Tye at Mayfield School - 24 July|
Dear Cllr Quinnen. It was good to have an opportunity for an informal conversation on Wednesday evening at Mayfield School and to welcome your nomination to the Project's management board. We would welcome a chance to show you more details of the work we have completed, and have in hand, to ensure Handsworth enjoys the benefits of a project that genuinely and transparently promotes and participates in service to local communities. We would very much like to emphasise two things: First we - the Voluntary Advisory Group (VAG) - have been voted powers by a quorum of the Project's original committee, to put in place, 1) the necessary paperwork and procedures to make the CHPCP legitimate and transparent, and 2) working practices appropriate to the project without prior consultation, agreeing that all decisions relating to those powers will be reported to and discussed with the Committee as necessary. In other words, though we have powers authorised by it, we are not ourselves the Management Committee or Board of the CHPCP (though Charles Bates is a member of both the old committee and the VAG), and we are not, unlike the committee, responsible for its liabilities. The reason we cannot just draw a line under the 'old' project and start another is that the accounts of the old project are such that its dissolution would almost certainly entail the loss of assets (two trucks, chipper, strimmers, chainsaw and other equipment) essential to the viability of any new project. We are using a limited pool of resources to settle various debts, including money owed to the inland revenue. We are optimistic that we can start to set up a new project whilst winding up the affairs of the other, ready for an immediate handover of assets, appointment of staff and commencement of work, as soon as the old project is dissolved. We greatly value your continued support in the coming months. Best wishes. Simon & Linda Baddeley for the Voluntary Advisory Group for Central Handsworth Practical Care Project
I borrowed Lin's car and went down to Rock Cottage to clear away encroaching greenery in readiness for repair work on the roof.
** ** **
Two days ago Tim DeChristopher an American climate activist and co-founder of the environmental group Peaceful Uprising was sentenced to two years in prison, fined $10,000. In 2008, he protested a US oil and gas lease auction of public land in Utah's redrock country by the Bureau of Land Management. DeChristopher placed fake bids to buy 14 parcels of land - 22,500 acres - for $1.8 million. Among his defence statements DeChristopher said "Those who are inspired to follow my actions are those who understand that we are on a path toward catastrophic consequences of climate change. They know their future, and the future of their loved ones, is on the line. And they know we are running out of time to turn things around. The closer we get to that point where it's too late, the less people have to lose by fighting back. " I noted especially these observations (my italics) in DeCristopher's statement to the court:
As a native of West Virginia, I have seen from a young age that the exploitation of fossil fuels has always gone hand in hand with the exploitation of local people. In West Virginia, we’ve been extracting coal longer than anyone else. And after 150 years of making other people rich, West Virginia is almost dead last among the states in per capita income, education rates and life expectancy. And it’s not an anomaly. The areas with the richest fossil fuel resources, whether coal in West Virginia and Kentucky, or oil in Louisiana and Mississippi, are the areas with the lowest standards of living. In part, this is a necessity of the industry. The only way to convince someone to blow up their backyard or poison their water is to make sure they are so desperate that they have no other option. But it is also the nature of the economic model. Since fossil fuels are limited resources, whoever controls access to that resource in the beginning gets to set all the terms. They set the terms for their workers, for the local communities, and apparently even for the regulatory agencies. A renewable energy economy is a threat to that model. Since no one can control access to the sun or the wind, the wealth is more likely to flow to whoever does the work of harnessing that energy, and therefore to create a more distributed economic system, which leads to a more distributed political system. It threatens the profits of the handful of corporations for whom the current system works, but our question is which segment of the public are you tasked with protecting.